The Satanic Verses, Truth And Falsity - 999 Words

Through the violent deaths and hypocrisy, doubt in the sacred is reintroduced. Eileen Barker illustrates brainwashing as the ‘control the religious leaders have exerted over their followers’. This questions whether belief is imposed or cultivated. John Updike writes that ‘Everything seemed still in place, yet something was immensely wrong’. Highlighting the sense of doubt in postmodernist texts, one may find that some things, such as religion, cannot be explained. Faith can waver or hold steadfast, characters revisiting belief in skepticism as ideology falters. In The Satanic Verses, truth and falsity is ultimately ambiguous. Some characters are featured as wrestling with religious doubt, others like Gibreel and Saladin think over their atheism after supernatural events. Definition is resisted, borders blurred, it is questionable whether events are happening or merely figments of imagination. Gibreel asks for ‘some sign’(30) that God is presen t during his illness, but realizes he is talking to air. He ‘lost his faith’(29) and even after metamorphosis, it is revealed that Gibreel is schizophrenic. The metamorphosis may be invented, as Rekha says to Gibreel ‘maybe you are going crazy’(7), but he is seen by several others to levitate. Illustrating the struggle between the real and imaginary, miracles are doubted, neither denied nor confirmed. From ‘Where there is no belief, there is no blasphemy’(380), the sacred is discredited and blasphemy is no more than a simpleShow MoreRelatedMedia Law: Defamation, Copyright, Etc23627 Words   |  95 Pagessubstantially true: section 23 Defamation Act 2005 (SA); section 22 Defamation Act 2006 (NT). The use of the phrase substantially was not a concept previously acknowledged by the common law. Essentially, this is the common law defence of truth. That is, the words or meanings complained of were defamatory of the plaintiff, but true. An example would be Smith is a convicted murderer. That is defamatory, but if true, the plaintiff has not been injured in any reputation to which he is entitledRead MoreMedia Law: Defamation, Copyright, Etc23639 Words   |  95 Pagessubstantially true: section 23 Defamation Act 2005 (SA); section 22 Defamation Act 2006 (NT). The use of the phrase substantially was not a concept previously acknowledged by the common law. Essentially, this is the common law defence of truth. That is, the words or meanings complained of were defamatory of the plaintiff, but true. An example would be Smith is a convicted murderer. That is defamatory, but if true, the plaintiff has not been injured in any reputation to which he is entitled

Ap Euro Kagan, Western Heritage 8th Edition. Ch. 9 and 10...

9/10 – 9/14 P.1 Neuman AP Euro Ch.9/10 Review Questions Kagan Western Heritage 8th edition Chapter 9 (1300-1527) 1. What were the underlying and precipitating causes of the Hundred Years’ War? What advantages did each side have? Why were the French able to drive the English almost entirely out of France? The first underlying and precipitating cause of the Hundred Years’ War was that England and France were too closely proximate emergent territorial powers. Another cause of the Hundred Years’ War was that Edward III of England was a vassal of Philip the Fair of France, and therefore held several sizeable French territories as fiefs. Also one of the underlying and precipitating causes of the Hundred Years’ was the quarrel between†¦show more content†¦How did the kings attack the church in this period? Contrast these events with ones in earlier ones in which the pope dominated rulers. The kings were able to control the church because the society had lost faith in the church due to the Black Death. Kings attacked the church by taxing them and controlling who the head clergy were. In older times there was no questioning of the church, so it was believed that if you prayed enough your ascension was inevitable, so if the king spoke up over the church then the church would excommunicate them and tell them they were going to hell. But when the Black Death struck, the first reaction was that if you prayed then you would be spared but that wasn’t the case because even some popes contracted the bubonic plagued. Faith was lost in the church. Chapter 10 1. Discuss Jacob Burkhardt’s interpretation of the Renaissance. What criticisms have been leveled against it? How would you define renaissance in the context of fifteenth and sixteenth-century Italy? Burkhardt’s interpretation of the renaissance implied that society was evolving in such a superior intellectual way that made Italians seem like a super race â€Å"full, whole nature of mankind† was achieved by the Italians, implying that no other race was too mediocrely advanced that they couldn’t even be called man. (In my opinion). Some of the criticisms of burkardt’s interpretation of the renaissance said that he overlooked the continuity

O’connor’s A Good Man Is Hard To Find Free Essays

From the title of the story itself, I was already expecting the plot to be showing the negative side of the characters. True enough, the characters involved seem to be downplaying their positive side as persons and indeed thrive on the conflicts their circumstances brought them. Every step along the way is a test of the family member’s character. We will write a custom essay sample on O’connor’s A Good Man Is Hard To Find or any similar topic only for you Order Now The bad guys who did the killing and whose presence have been foreshadowed already by the grandmother are cold-blooded murderers who do not mind ending the lives of even the old and the young characters there. Being a classic story most often included in the studies of the young (in school), I was expecting a rather conservative storyline instead of a violent one. So it was with great surprise for me that the story ended with less to be desired. Even if I was preparing myself to be open-minded in reading materials such as these, I still can’t help feeling bad about the outcome of the story. It definitely changes my perception of things. The story reminds me that indeed, there is always a good and a bad side in every person. When the grandmother touches the â€Å"Misfit† before she was killed, I believe she was then showing compassion and forgiveness to the person in question. It could also be an appeal to spare her life. However, I wish to reiterate that after all the experiences the grandmother must have gone through, she can already see through a person’s true self, and perhaps, just perhaps, she has seen the goodness of the killer inspite of it all. On the other hand, the Misfit also showed a willingness to be humane when he recognized the possibility of the grandmother becoming good in the true sense of the word, if only she can be reminded all the time. I believe the Misfit’s sentence was a metaphor. How to cite O’connor’s A Good Man Is Hard To Find, Papers

Media Representation Reflection Paper free essay sample

The representations of drug users in the shows â€Å"Breaking Bad† and â€Å"It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia† show the stereotypes of the modern day drug users from two different genre perspectives. In â€Å"Breaking Bad†, the show uses a dramatic up-front approach to show the horrors of meth use. It portrays the meth addicted parents as horrible degenerates of society. All they are focused on are drugs and how to acquire their next fix. The main female character in the episode is a meth addicted mother that experiences a role conflict when she has to decide to either take care of her son or cater to her addiction. The episode shows a highly graphic portrayal of the insanity of addiction. As the couple fights, chooses drugs over their child, and eventually the woman kills her partner and steals his drugs. On the other side of the equation the episode portrays, Jesse, one of the shows main characters as a sympathetic figure. We will write a custom essay sample on Media Representation Reflection Paper or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page He is a drug dealer that is getting a revenge on the two customers that robbed him of an ounce of methamphetamine. Upon entering the ram shackled house he stumbles upon a child living in horrible conditions. He feeds the child and takes care of him until the two meth addicted parents show up. Although he uses strong language with them and threatens them with a gun, I always felt like he was the â€Å"good† guy in the situations. That is because the episode shows his depth of character and his compassion towards the child. He is also caught up in a role conflict as he is supposed to be a badass drug dealer with no conscience but he also is a human being with morals. He ends up calling the cops and putting the child outside which I assume saves the child. We see him as the hero in the show. In â€Å"Its Always Sunny in Philadelphia†, the show uses a comedic slant to stereotype crack use and poverty in general. It portrays drug users as lazy, homeless people that are living off the government. Ignoring responsibility and getting high in the middle of the afternoon. It is a highly generalized depiction that exploits a serious issue for comedic value. Crackheads have almost become a comedic meme in society today. Their behavior is so off the wall and shocking that as a society as a whole we choose to deal with it with humor. Both of the shows portrayals of drug use represent that social construction of the drug addict in modern society. This depiction is based on the hardcore addicts living in rock bottom addiction. In my addiction I showed some of the characteristics shown in the shows and I know many people who also fell into this description. Although it does use the worst addicts to describe addiction in general, I feel like Breaking Bad does an honest job of showing the shocking disease of meth addiction. I feel like â€Å"It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia† is more of a biased approach and really undermines the seriousness of the issue. It is a comedy show, however, and it delivers as a hilarious episode. The perception I had growing up and mainstream society still has of an addict is one that permeates throughout these shows. In my opinion drugs should be legalized and harm reduction should be the new frontier of the drug issue. The media, however, perpetuates fear in their portrayal of addiction using all genres and keeps the mainstream public in the dark about the real issues. It keeps the prohibition line of thinking as the prevailing solution for drug use and keeps the drug war going.